Licensed center

White River Children's Academy

A center, licensed for 104 children. Two complaint investigations found violations since 2023; 150 of 203 similar-size Seattle-area centers had none.

How they teach

Not published

Who cares for your child

Not published

What it costs

Not published

Shortlist can ask White River Children's Academy for what it has not published: how they teach, who is with the children and for how long, what it costs, hours and late pickup, a typical day and sick and biting policies. The answer will go on this page.

What the state has found

Two complaint investigations found violations since February 2023

150: none52: one to four1: five or more

The 203 Seattle-area centers licensed for 71 to 114 children, the size band this one falls in, as of September 26, 2026.

Larger centers have more complaint investigations, so White River Children's Academy (104 children) is compared with centers its size. Of those 203, 150 have had no complaint investigation that found a violation since February 2023. White River Children's Academy has had two. The most recent was in July 2025. Six centers its size have had more.

Routine visits: 2 of 3 cited something

Across Seattle-area centers, the state cites something at about 2 in 3 routine visits (1,966 visits). Three visits are too few to read as a pattern.

From Washington DCYF’s published reports, last checked September 26, 2026.

Read every record and the state’s reports

State record — Washington DCYF

Last visit
April 28, 2026
On file
3 visits since April 2024 — 1 cited nothing · 2 complaint investigations
Fixed?
Washington DCYF does not publish whether a finding was corrected.
Most serious
Serious — During the course of the complaint assessment, Licensor Champney determined that there was sufficient information to conclude that a licensing violation more likely than not occurred. Based on information gathered from the center director, teaching staff, and the referent, it was determined that the child care staff failed to report the incident to the department after being informed that the child had sought medical attention. The medical evaluation confirmed that the child sustained a fracture of the talus bone in the foot, which required the application of a cast. Although the incident occurred on July 3 the report was submitted by the referent on July 5. · July 11, 2025

Washington DCYF publishes the licensor’s own observation and a risk level for every citation it issues at a licensing visit, with the inspection report attached as a PDF.

Apr 2026 Licensing visit nothing cited Report (PDF)
Jul 2025 Complaint 2 valid issues

Complaint · July 5, 2025 · Resolved September 22, 2025

Duty to protect children and report incidents

WAC 110-300-0475(2) · Serious

During the course of the complaint assessment, Licensor Champney determined that there was sufficient information to conclude that a licensing violation more likely than not occurred. Based on information gathered from the center director, teaching staff, and the referent, it was determined that the child care staff failed to report the incident to the department after being informed that the child had sought medical attention. The medical evaluation confirmed that the child sustained a fracture of the talus bone in the foot, which required the application of a cast. Although the incident occurred on July 3 the report was submitted by the referent on July 5.

Report (PDF)

May 2025 Licensing visit 1 finding

Licensing visit · May 7, 2025

Medication

WAC 110-300-0215(3)(a)(ii) · Serious

A prescription epi pen was expired in the discovery preschool room.

Report (PDF)

Jan 2025 Complaint 1 valid issue

Complaint · January 29, 2025 · Resolved April 2, 2025

Prohibited behavior and discipline, and physical separation of children

WAC 110-300-0331(1) · Serious

During the course of the complaint investigation, Licensor Smith concluded that there was enough evidence collected during interviews with staff that a violation had occurred. Licensor observed the poster that was removed from the classroom and the staff incident reports. The nature and content of the poster was determined to be a "put down" to the children in care.

Report (PDF)

Apr 2024 Licensing visit 3 findings

Licensing visit · April 26, 2024

Food allergies and special dietary needs

WAC 110-300-0186(1) / 110-300-0186(2) · Serious

(1, 2) Licensor observed no individual care plan in place with the child's medication. Licensor observed a child with a food allergy did not have an Epi-pen on site. Medication training by the parent was not provided to staff to properly manage a child's food allergies.

Safety requirements

WAC 110-300-0165(2)(d) / 110-300-0165(5)(g) · Serious

Licensor observed plastic bags accessible to children. 0165 (3f) Licensor observed a microwave stored on top of a mini fridge not safely secured posing a risk of falling. 0165 (5e) Licensor observed a power strip accessible to children. 0165 (5f) Licensor observed an extension cord used as a main power source accessible to children. 0165 (5g) Licensor observed an extension cord plugged near a water source (water dispenser and fish tank) accessible to children.

Storage of hazardous and maintenance supplies

WAC 110-300-0260(5) · Serious

Licensor observed janitorial equipment (broom and dust pan) stored in the child care space accessible to children.

Report (PDF)

A day here

Not published

Details

Address
2501 Warner Ave
License
PL-78068, active
Quality program
Early Achievers Level 5

Do you run White River Children's Academy? Shortlist has no tuition, hours or ratios for it, because the state does not publish that. Add what is missing. It is free and takes about ten minutes.

Sources and dates

Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.

All checked September 2026.

State record

Every state visit and complaint on file, shown in full and never edited. Open a date to read what the state wrote.

Details