Washington DCYF cited something at 3 of the 4 visits below. Across Seattle centers it cites something at about 67% of visits. Each state decides what gets written up, so this compares Seattle with Seattle and never with another state.
Not yet reported: ages served, hours, days / week, schedule, holiday closures.
This provider does not publish pricing.
Licensor reviewed the child's records and verified the child had a documented allergy and Individual Care Plan on file. Interviews with staff determined the child's designated meal was not included on the food cart delivered by the kitchen staff. Staff reported that when the child's meal was not received, the classroom teacher located a container of yogurt in the classroom that was not labeled and assumed it belonged to the child. The teacher served the yogurt to the child without verifying its contents or contacting the kitchen regarding the missing snack. The yogurt contained dairy, a known allergen identified in the child's allergy documentation. Sufficient evidence was obtained to determine the staff failed to follow the child's allergy plan. Allegation determined to be Valid.· May 26, 2026
Washington DCYF publishes the licensor’s own observation and a risk level for every citation it issues at a licensing visit, with the inspection report attached as a PDF.
Complaint · May 18, 2026 · Resolved July 16, 2026
Reported to the state by the program
Serious injury, valid issues and self-report are Washington’s own fields on its complaint listing.
Food allergies and special dietary needs
WAC 110-300-0186(4) · Serious
Licensor reviewed the child's records and verified the child had a documented allergy and Individual Care Plan on file. Interviews with staff determined the child's designated meal was not included on the food cart delivered by the kitchen staff. Staff reported that when the child's meal was not received, the classroom teacher located a container of yogurt in the classroom that was not labeled and assumed it belonged to the child. The teacher served the yogurt to the child without verifying its contents or contacting the kitchen regarding the missing snack. The yogurt contained dairy, a known allergen identified in the child's allergy documentation. Sufficient evidence was obtained to determine the staff failed to follow the child's allergy plan. Allegation determined to be Valid.
Licensing visit · April 29, 2026
WAC 110-300-0106(3) · Short Term
110-300-0106 (3) Staff person Adriana Arca Avellaneda has not completed Child Care Basics training Date Disputed Date Disputed
WAC 110-300-0106(8) · Short Term
110-300-0106(8) Staff person Adriana Arca Avellaneda has expired Safe Sleep Training Date Disputed Date Disputed
WAC 110-300-0106(12) · Serious
110-300-0106 (12) Staff person Anath Avellaneda Amaro is missing a current Food Workers Card
Complaint · January 21, 2026 · Resolved May 27, 2026
Reported to the state by the program
Serious injury, valid issues and self-report are Washington’s own fields on its complaint listing.
Food allergies and special dietary needs
WAC 110-300-0186(4) · Serious
110-300-0186 (4) There is sufficant evidence to support a WAC violation occured, as staff A.A.A. and staff A.A.A. fed the child food he was allergic to provided by the program without checking to see if he could consume the food when the child brings his own food from home due to allergies
Individual employees are shown by initials. The state’s report, linked above, names them in full.
Licensing visit · January 20, 2026
WAC 110-300-0106(3) · Short Term
Of the files reviewed staff members Grecia and Abigail have not completed the Child Care Basics. Completed Date Disputed Date Disputed
WAC 110-300-0106(8) · Short Term
Multiple staff are missing current safe sleep training noted in MERIT. There was no current training copies in the files reviewed and the assistant director on site was not aware if the staff had taken the training recently. Completed Date Disputed Date Disputed
WAC 110-300-0106(12) · Serious
Multiple staff are missing current food handlers training noted in MERIT. There was no current training copies in the files reviewed and the assistant director on site was not aware if the staff had taken the training recently.
Complaint · July 30, 2025 · Resolved September 28, 2025
Prohibited behavior and discipline, and physical separation of children
WAC 110-300-0331(1) · Serious
110-300-0331(1)(d) Staff admitted to making derogatory remarks about the child when he arrived daily, and stated other teachers do the same
Licensing visit · April 9, 2025
WAC 110-300-0106(12) · Serious
It was observed that many staff have expired food handlers cards.
WAC 110-300-0106(12) · Serious
It was observed many staff have not completed child care basics.
WAC 110-300-0106(12) · Serious
It was observed many staff have expired safe sleep training.
WAC 110-300-0106(12) · Serious
It was observed that 1 staff have an expired first aid and CPR training and 4 staff have not completed first aid and cpr training.
WAC 110-300-0115(1) · Long Term
It was observed Merit was not updated with current trainings.
Complaint · June 3, 2024 · Resolved June 20, 2024
The state lists this complaint on the provider’s record, but the state’s published report includes no citation detail.
Cost, hours and late pickup, a typical day, sick and biting policies.
Ask what changed after the nine findings Washington DCYF ranked Serious, most recently in May 2026.It does not publish whether a finding was fixed. The rest carry its lower risk levels.
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
Not yet reported: established, teaching approach.
Every state visit and complaint on file, shown in full and never edited. Open a date to read what the state wrote.
Do you run Everbrook Academy? Shortlist has no tuition, hours or ratios for it, because the state does not publish that. Add what is missing. It is free and takes about ten minutes.