YMCA Sf/Mission Branch-Villa De Kapuso

HSC 1596.871(c)(1)(A) · Type A

1596.871(c)(1)(A):Subsequent to initial licensure, a person specified in subdivision (b) who is not exempt from fingerprinting shall obtain either a criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, pursuant to subdivision(f) of this section or Section 1522.7, from the State Department of Social Services prior to employment, residence, or initial presence in the facility. Civil penalty of $100 was issued. Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. S2 did not have criminal record clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.

HSC 1596.871(c)(1)(A) · Type B

1596.871(c)(1)(A): 1596.871(c)(1)(A):Subsequent to initial licensure, a person specified in subdivision (b) who is not exempt from fingerprinting shall obtain either a criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, pursuant to subdivision(f) of this section or Section 1522.7, from the State Department of Social Services prior to employment, residence, or initial presence in the facility. Civil penalty of $100 was issued. Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. S3 did not have criminal record clearance association, which poses protential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.

ALLEGATION(S): Day care child sustained a bruise and staff has no knowledge of it INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. conducted a visit to the facility to close the complaint. Present at the facility were 8 staff members and 20 children. The program director, K. arrived during the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed four staff members and the child’s parent. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, it remains unclear how the child sustained the reported bruise. Based on the information gathered, the complaint finding is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to establish that the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

CCR 101216.1(c)(1) · Type B

101216.1(c)(1) Teacher Qualifications and Duties:Twelve post-secondary semester or equivalent quarter units in early childhood education or child development completed, with passing grades, at an accredited or approved college or university; and at least six months of work experience in a licensed child care center or comparable group child care program This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Reviewing the staff files. The staff does not have 12 ECE units covering for the fully qualified teacher who was out to lunch. This is a potential health and safety hazard.

ALLEGATION(S): Staff inappropriately handled daycare child, causing injury. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst, LPA Y. conducted a visit to close this complaint. Present at the facility were site director, M.N., 7 staff members, 24 preschool children and 6 infants children. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the reporting party, site director, program director, three staff members, and video footages were reviewed. Based on the information obtained this complaint finding is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. This report was read and explained to the facility's representative. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in day care children hitting other day care children. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Y. conducted a visit to close the complaint investigation. Present at the facility were Site Director T.N., seven staff members, and 24 children. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the site director and reviewed video footage. Based on the information obtained, the finding for this complaint is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is considered unsubstantiated. This report was read and explained to the facility's representative. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: