Skip to main content

San Francisco · Licensed center

Wu Yee Children's Services-Southeast ELC

At a glance

  • Medium center, licensed for 53 children.
  • Run by a nonprofit. A board oversees it, and there are no owners taking profit.

What the state has found

The state cited rules at 1 of its 9 licensing inspections since August 2022.

See each inspection

Licensing inspections

  • Sep 17, 2026Nothing cited
  • Jan 12, 2026Nothing cited
  • Aug 26, 2025Nothing cited
  • Mar 27, 2025Nothing cited
  • Oct 21, 20241 citation
    • CCR 101223(a)(3)Type B
      • “(a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: interference with functions of daily living including eating, sleeping or toileting; or withholding of shelter, clothing, medication or aids to physical functioning. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”

        CCR 101223(a)(3)

  • Apr 9, 2024Nothing cited
  • Mar 26, 2024Nothing cited
  • Oct 31, 2023Nothing cited
  • Aug 17, 2022Nothing cited

The state cited rules at 1 of this center's 9 inspections. Most Bay Area centers inspected 9 times had more: 75% of 48 had rules cited at 2 or more.

How all 48 Bay Area centers inspected 9 times compare

Of the 48 Bay Area centers the state inspected 9 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:

  • None2%
  • 1 of 923%This center
  • 2 of 921%
  • 3 of 923%
  • 4 of 913%
  • 5 of 915%
  • 6 of 92%
  • 7 of 92%
Read every record and the state’s reports

State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing

Last visit
September 17, 2026
On file
9 visits since August 2022 — 8 cited nothing · 9 complaint investigations
Most serious
No finding carrying a severity level in the last 24 months.

California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.

Sep 2026 Licensing visit nothing cited
Mar 2026 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · March 24, 2026

ALLEGATION(S): Staff member handled day care child in care in a rough manner. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On March 25, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a complaint inspection and met with Director B.D. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present were Director, 11 teachers with 39 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility staff handled child in rough manner. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Jan 2026 Licensing visit nothing cited
Aug 2025 Licensing visit nothing cited
Mar 2025 Licensing visit nothing cited
Nov 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · November 15, 2024

ALLEGATION(S): Staff spanking day care children. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On December 4, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection in response to the above complaint allegation. LPA met with Director B.D. and explained purpose of inspection. Present today were director and 9 teachers with 34 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, staff, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility staff spank children. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted with dector B.D. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit will be posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Oct 2024 Licensing visit 1 finding

Licensing visit · October 21, 2024

CCR 101223(a)(3) · Type B

(a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: interference with functions of daily living including eating, sleeping or toileting; or withholding of shelter, clothing, medication or aids to physical functioning. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

State report

Jun 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · June 24, 2024

ALLEGATION(S): -Lack of supervision resulting in daycare child sustaining an injury. -Staff did not inform daycare child's authorized representative of incident involving child. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On June 26, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a complaint inspection and met with Director R.P. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present were Director, 9 staff with 31 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility had lack of supervison or not inform authorized representative of incident. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Apr 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · April 17, 2024

ALLEGATION(S): Teachers were hitting child INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On June 13, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director R.P. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 9 staff with 33 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that teachers hit child. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Apr 2024 Licensing visit nothing cited
Mar 2024 Licensing visit nothing cited
Oct 2023 Licensing visit nothing cited
Oct 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · October 23, 2023

ALLEGATION(S): Staff did not ensure play area was free from hazards. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On December 15, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with D.P. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 13 staff with 35 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the staff did not ensure play area was free from hazards. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Jun 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · June 9, 2023

ALLEGATION(S): Staff forced day care child to take a nap Staff made false claims Staff are not following admission agreement INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On July 17, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), N.G. conducted an unannounced complaint visit and met with director, R.P. to discuss the above allegations. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present are, 6 teachers with 30 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff members and Program Director, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that Staff forced day care child to take a nap, Staff made false claims, and Staff are not following admission agreement. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

May 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · May 16, 2023

ALLEGATION(S): Staff do not manage daycare child's behavior INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On May 23, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a complaint inspection and met with Family Advocate Jasmine Guevara Fuentes to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Advocate, 6 teachers with 20 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that staff do not mamage child's behavior. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 60

State report

Oct 2022 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · October 21, 2022

ALLEGATION(S): Child sustained unexplained injuries while in care INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On December 13, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director, E.B.R., to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 9 staff with 22 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the child sustained unexplained injuries while in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Aug 2022 Licensing visit nothing cited

Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.

Details

Phone
(415) 230-7508
Address
1550 Evans Avenue, San Francisco, 94124
License
384004495

We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, and sick and biting policies. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.

Run Wu Yee Children's Services-Southeast ELC? Correct or add anything here, free.
Sources and dates

Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.

All checked November 2026.

State record

The state’s licensing transparency data reports 9 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 8 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=11, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.

From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.

Details

Medium means the middle half of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 31 to 75 children. Small is 8 to 30; large is 76 to 312.

Watch