Supporting Future Growth CDC, Inc.

ALLEGATION(S): Parents not allowed inside the facility. Facility did not abide to child's dietary restrictions. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On 11/06/2024 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) C.W. and J.M. J.V. conducted an unannounced Subsequent Complaint Investigation at Supporting Future Growth CDC, INC. LPA met with Director, L.F. and explained the purpose of today’s inspection. During today's inspection, there was 4 toddlers with 2 staff in 3 classrooms. Director stated there are 5 toddlers enrolled. The finding for the above allegation was delivered during the inspection. Complainant alleges that Parents not allowed inside the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPAs completed a physical plant inspection, reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. LPA cannot determine at this time whether the facility does not allow parents and/or authroized representatives inside the facility. Based on the interviews and information obtained throughout the investigation, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED which means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No Deficiency has been cited for this allegation. Exit interview conducted with Director, L.F. Appeal rights were provided. A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND MUST BE POSTED FOR 30 CONSECTIVE DAYS. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: On 11/06/2024 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) C.W. and J.M. J.V. conducted an unannounced Subsequent Complaint Investigation at Supporting Future Growth CDC, INC. LPA met with Director, L.F. and explained the purpose of today’s inspection. During today's inspection, there was # toddlers with 2 staff. Director stated there are 6 toddlers enrolled. The finding for the above allegation was delivered during the inspection. Complainant alleges that Facility did not abide to child's dietary restrictions. During the course of the investigation, LPAscompleted a physical plant inspection, reviewed facility records and conducted interviews. LPA cannot determine at this time whether facility did or did not abide to child's dietary restriction. Based on the interviews and information obtained throughout the investigation, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED which means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No Deficiency has been cited for this allegation. Exit interview conducted with Director. Appeal rights were provided. A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND MUST BE POSTED FOR 30 CONSECTIVE DAYS. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

Type B

No deficiency text was recorded under this citation in the source report.

Deficiency Dismissed

101700.3(b)(2) · Type B

101700.3(b)(2) Licensees shall maintain a lead value at or below the Action Level of 5 ppb in all outlets subject to the testing requirements of these Written Directives, for the health and safety of children in care. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Center's two (2) water outlets that exceeded the Action Level established by the State for exposure, located in the kitchen and were used for food preparation. This posed a potential risk to health/safety of children in care.