Petaluma · Licensed center
Spring Hill Montessori
At a glance
- Large center, licensed for 107 children.
What the state has found
The state cited rules at 2 of its 7 licensing inspections since April 2022.
See each inspection
Licensing inspections
- Sep 9, 2026Nothing cited
- Sep 19, 2024Nothing cited
- Jul 2, 2024Nothing cited
- Mar 27, 2024Nothing cited
Jan 6, 20231 citation
101700.3(b)(1)Type B
“101700.3(b)(1) A result with values of 5.0 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, facility drinking fountains (Site “A” and Site “B”) exceeded the allowable levels of lead in the water, testing at 8 ppb and 9ppb. This is a potential health and safety risk to children in care.”
101700.3(b)(1)
Jun 8, 20221 citation
CCR 101229(a)(1)Type B
“No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time ... Supervision shall include visual observation. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA's observation and multiple witness statements that multiple times staff attempted to supervise children on the playground and supervise from a distance as children used the indoor bathroom, resulting in a lack of supervision. This posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
CCR 101229(a)(1)
- Apr 11, 2022Nothing cited
The state cited rules at 2 of this center's 7 inspections. Bay Area centers inspected 7 times split three ways: 45% had fewer, 26% the same, and 29% more (145 centers).
How all 145 Bay Area centers inspected 7 times compare
Of the 145 Bay Area centers the state inspected 7 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:
- None19%
- 1 of 726%
- 2 of 726%This center
- 3 of 715%
- 4 of 710%
- 5 of 73%
- 6 of 71%
Read every record and the state’s reports
State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing
- Last visit
- September 9, 2026
- On file
- 7 visits since April 2022 — 5 cited nothing · 3 complaint investigations
- Most serious
- No finding carrying a severity level in the last 24 months.
California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.
Jan 2023 Licensing visit 1 finding
Licensing visit · January 6, 2023
101700.3(b)(1) · Type B
101700.3(b)(1) A result with values of 5.0 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, facility drinking fountains (Site “A” and Site “B”) exceeded the allowable levels of lead in the water, testing at 8 ppb and 9ppb. This is a potential health and safety risk to children in care.
Dec 2022 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · December 27, 2022
ALLEGATION(S): -Uncleared staff are supervising children -Facility does not ensure that personnel records are maintained -Staff without a drivers license transporting children -Facility did not submit an application for change of ownership INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: An unannounced follow-up complaint investigation visit to the facility was made today by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Y.Y. to deliver complaint investigation findings. The LPA met with the center’s Executive Director, S.H. to discuss the investigation findings. It has been alleged that the facility utilizes uncleared adults to supervise daycare children, that the facility is not maintaining personnel files for its staff, that staff without a driver’s license are transporting daycare children, and that the facility did not submit an application for a change of ownership. The initial complaint investigation visit to the center was made by LPA. S. P. on 01/06/23; LPA P. met with Executive Director H., made observations, and obtained documents pertaining to the investigation. During LPA Y.’s follow-up visit on 02/02/23, the LPA interviewed the center’s Associate Head of School, T.W. regarding the allegations. W. denied the allegations and provided information regarding the center’s operations. Executive Director H. was not present during the LPA’s follow-up visit and was interviewed by the LPA on 02/08/23. H. stated that she also denies all allegations made against the center. H. stated that all staff and volunteers at the center are fingerprint cleared before being allowed to work on site. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Jun 2022 Licensing visit 1 finding
Licensing visit · June 8, 2022
CCR 101229(a)(1) · Type B
No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time ... Supervision shall include visual observation. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA's observation and multiple witness statements that multiple times staff attempted to supervise children on the playground and supervise from a distance as children used the indoor bathroom, resulting in a lack of supervision. This posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Apr 2022 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · April 4, 2022
ALLEGATION(S): Day care is out of ratio INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: An unannounced subsequent complaint investigation inspection was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst J.V. (LPA), who met with Director S.H. (D1) and Operations Manager L.H. (D3). It has been alleged the facility operated out of ratio on several occasions, with one staff providing care for as many as 20 children or more on the playground. D1 denied the allegation and stated the facility always has more than enough classroom staff on site and providing care to stay within required ratio and prioritizes the well-being of children above all other considerations. During today's inspection visit, twelve classroom staff provided care to 90 children. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, observed facility staff provide care to children, conducted witness interviews, and requested and reviewed pertinent documents and materials. Witness statements, documentation, and observation failed to corroborate the allegation that the facility operated out of ratio. Based on interviews and facility documents, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report was reviewed and discussed with D1 and D3. Appeal Rights were provided and exit interview was conducted. All licensing reports are public information and must be made available upon request for at least three years. D1 and D3 were provided with a Notice of Site Visit (NOS) to be posted in the facility for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.
Details
- Phone
- (707) 763-9222
- Address
- 825 Middlefield Dr, Petaluma, 94952
- License
- 490101798
We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, sick and biting policies, and who owns it. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.
Sources and dates
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
All checked November 2026.
State record
The state’s licensing transparency data reports 2 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 2 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=5, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.
From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.
Details
- Phone, Address, License ccld.dss.ca.gov
Large means the biggest quarter of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 76 to 312 children. Small is 8 to 30; medium is 31 to 75.