San Jose · Licensed center
Sjb - Vinci Park Child Development Center
At a glance
- Medium center, licensed for 40 children.
What the state has found
The state cited rules at 1 of its 6 licensing inspections since December 2021.
See each inspection
Licensing inspections
- May 21, 2026Nothing cited
- Dec 3, 2025Nothing cited
Jul 3, 20252 citations
CCR 101229(a)Type A
“(a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, staff did not provide the care and supervision necessary to meet a child's needs, which resulted in them leaving the facility grounds. This posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.”
CCR 101229(a)
CCR 101238.2(g)Type B
“(g) The playground shall be enclosed by a fence to protect children and to keep them in the outdoor activity area. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the fence in the outdoor activity area had a gate with a broken lock. This posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.”
CCR 101238.2(g)
- Jul 1, 2025Nothing cited
- Nov 14, 2024Nothing cited
- Dec 2, 2021Nothing cited
The state cited rules at 1 of this center's 6 inspections. Bay Area centers inspected 6 times split three ways: 17% had fewer, 35% the same, and 48% more (252 centers).
How all 252 Bay Area centers inspected 6 times compare
Of the 252 Bay Area centers the state inspected 6 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:
- None17%
- 1 of 635%This center
- 2 of 631%
- 3 of 612%
- 4 of 66%
Read every record and the state’s reports
State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing
- Last visit
- May 21, 2026
- On file
- 6 visits since December 2021 — 5 cited nothing · 4 complaint investigations
- Most serious
- Type A —
(a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, staff did not provide the care and supervision necessary to meet a child's needs, which resulted in them leaving the facility grounds. This posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.
· July 3, 2025
California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.
Oct 2025 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · October 29, 2025
ALLEGATION(S): Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in day child engaging in inappropriate touching with another day care child. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On 12/17/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L.F.D. conducted an unannounced complaint investigation and met with S., A.M. Teacher (MT). The purpose of today’s visit is to deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. During visit, there were five (5) children present. Staff were in-compliance with children's ratio on 11/5/2025, and 12/10/2025. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Reporting Party (RP), staff, children and obtained documents. Continue on
Aug 2025 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · August 27, 2025
ALLEGATION(S): A teacher yelled at a day care child. The facility did not report an incident to an authorized representative. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On 11/13/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L.F.D. conducted an unannounced complaint investigation and was greeted by C., A. - Director. The purpose of today’s visit is to deliver complaint findings on the above allegations. LPA gathered a census of the day care children. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Reporting Party (RP), staff member, former staff, and parent and obtained documents. It was alleged that, a child (C1) was yelled at by a former staff (fs) and the facility did not report an incident to an authorized representative. Based on interviews conducted, there were no witnesses to the incident that allegedly occurred on 10/22/2024. FS was interviewed and denied any incidents with C1. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director, C.A. along with appeal rights provided. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Jul 2025 Licensing visit 2 findings
Licensing visit · July 3, 2025
CCR 101229(a) · Type A
(a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, staff did not provide the care and supervision necessary to meet a child's needs, which resulted in them leaving the facility grounds. This posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.
Request Denied
CCR 101238.2(g) · Type B
(g) The playground shall be enclosed by a fence to protect children and to keep them in the outdoor activity area. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the fence in the outdoor activity area had a gate with a broken lock. This posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.
Dec 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · December 10, 2024
ALLEGATION(S): Child was hit for not taking a nap INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) M.M. & S.B. met with L.F., director, and N.H., director in training, for an unannounced follow up complaint investigation. Purpose of today's investigation: Deliver investigation findings. Based on interviews, observations, record reviews, and evidence gathered during the investigation process, it is concluded that although the allegation noted on this complaint may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. The allegation is thus UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with L.F., director, and N.H., director in training. No deficiencies issued. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.
Details
- Phone
- (408) 251-1060
- Address
- 1311 Vinci Park Way, San Jose, 95131
- License
- 434408751
We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, sick and biting policies, and who owns it. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.
Sources and dates
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
All checked November 2026.
State record
The state’s licensing transparency data reports 3 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 3 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=4, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.
From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.
Details
- Phone, Address, License ccld.dss.ca.gov
Medium means the middle half of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 31 to 75 children. Small is 8 to 30; large is 76 to 312.