Skip to main content

Dublin · Licensed center

School of Imagination

At a glance

  • Large center, licensed for 87 children.

What the state has found

The state cited rules at 3 of its 5 licensing inspections since September 2022.

See each inspection

Licensing inspections

  • Sep 23, 20261 citation
    • CCR 101223(a)(1)Type B
      • “101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1)To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interviews, and record reviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.”

        CCR 101223(a)(1)

  • Nov 19, 2024Nothing cited
  • Apr 18, 20241 citation
    • CCR 101223(a)(3)Type B
      • “101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights:(3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: ...... aids to physical functioning. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not comply with the section cited above. S1 withheld food from the C1, resulting in a violation of his/her personal rights, which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.”

        CCR 101223(a)(3)

  • Sep 14, 2023Nothing cited
  • Sep 22, 20221 citation
    • CCR 101226(e)(2)Type B
      • “(2) All prescription and nonprescription medications shall be maintained with the child's name and shall be dated. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation,record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above.C1, C2, C3 and C4's epipens/medications were found to be expired, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.”

        CCR 101226(e)(2)

The state cited rules at 3 of this center's 5 inspections. Most Bay Area centers inspected 5 times had fewer: 88% of 457 had rules cited at 2 or fewer.

How all 457 Bay Area centers inspected 5 times compare

Of the 457 Bay Area centers the state inspected 5 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:

  • None29%
  • 1 of 535%
  • 2 of 523%
  • 3 of 59%This center
  • 4 of 54%
  • All 5under 1%
Read every record and the state’s reports

State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing

Last visit
September 23, 2026
On file
5 visits since September 2022 — 2 cited nothing · 5 complaint investigations
Most serious
Type B — 101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1)To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interviews, and record reviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care. · September 23, 2026

California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.

Sep 2026 Licensing visit 1 finding

Licensing visit · September 23, 2026

CCR 101223(a)(1) · Type B

101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1)To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interviews, and record reviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.

State report

Jun 2026 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · June 18, 2026

ALLEGATION(S): -Staff threw a shoe at a child in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with Director C.S. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present during the inspection were the director and 13 staff members supervising 28 children in care. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility disclosed an incident that was also self reported to the Community Care Licensing Division. Furthermore, the interviews and record review did not identify any concrete evidence to support the allegation that the staff member threw the shoe at the child, which concludes that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is "Unsubstantiated". Notice of Site visit and appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with the director, C.S. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Nov 2024 Licensing visit nothing cited
Apr 2024 Licensing visit 1 finding

Licensing visit · April 18, 2024

CCR 101223(a)(3) · Type B

101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights:(3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse or other actions of a punitive nature including but not limited to: ...... aids to physical functioning. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not comply with the section cited above. S1 withheld food from the C1, resulting in a violation of his/her personal rights, which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.

State report

Jan 2024 Complaint 2 of 3 allegations substantiated

Complaint · January 31, 2024

California decided each allegation separately.

Substantiated

  • -Facility staff are not qualified.
  • -Facility staff handled day care children in a rough manner.

Unsubstantiated

  • -Facility staff are not being adequately supervising day care children.

Substantiated: the state found it more likely than not that it happened. Unsubstantiated: the state could not tell whether it happened.

CCR 101216.1(b)(1) · Type B

101216.1(b)(1)Teacher Qualifications and Duties b) Prior to employment, a teacher shall meet the requirements of (b)(1) below: (1) A teacher shall have completed, with passing grades, at least six postsecondary semester or equivalent quarter units....... obtained a Child Development Assistance Permit issued by the California Commission on Teacher C. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The RBTs who do not have teacher qualifications are left alone in the classrooms which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.

CCR 101223(a)(1) · Type B

101223 (a)(1) Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The facility is aware of incidents where the child(ren) were disciplined, roughly, violating the children's personal rights.

State report, March 27, 2024

Oct 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · October 2, 2023

ALLEGATION(S): Staff did not adequately supervise day care children resulting in inappropriate interactions between children in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with Director C.S. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present for today's visit were the director, 26 fingerprint-cleared and associated staff members, and 34 children in care. Based on the interview, observation, and record review, the LPA has determined that no one in the facility has witnessed inappropriate interactions. Furthermore, the interview also revealed that no such incident was brought directly to the facility representatives by the children, which concludes that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Notice of Site visit and appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with the Facility Representative, C.S. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Sep 2023 Licensing visit nothing cited
Oct 2022 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · October 25, 2022

ALLEGATION(S): -Facility staff abused child in care -Staff did not prevent inappropriate interactions between day care children. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with Director C.S. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present for today's visit were the director and 27 fingerprint-cleared and associated staff members, and 86 children in care. During the course of investigation, the Investigation Branch (IB) and LPA interviewed the director, Staff, and guardian and received pertinent documents. Based on the interviews, the Facility denies that Staff abused the child in care. Staff Interviews reveal that no one has witnessed anyone abusing any child. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Notice of Site visit and appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with the Facility Representative, C.S. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with Director C.S. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present for today's visit were the director and 27 fingerprint-cleared and associated staff members, and 86 children in care. During the course of the investigation, the Investigation Branch (IB) and LPA interviewed the director, Staff, and guardian and received pertinent documents. Based on the interviews, the Facility denies any inappropriate interactions between daycare children and the Staff. The Facility stated that no one has ever seen anyone touching a child inappropriately. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Notice of Site visit and appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with the Facility Representative, C.S. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Sep 2022 Licensing visit 1 finding

Licensing visit · September 22, 2022

CCR 101226(e)(2) · Type B

(2) All prescription and nonprescription medications shall be maintained with the child's name and shall be dated. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation,record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above.C1, C2, C3 and C4's epipens/medications were found to be expired, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to children in care.

State report

Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.

Details

Phone
(925) 829-9552
Address
9801 Dublin Blvd, Dublin, 94568
License
013420914

We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, sick and biting policies, and who owns it. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.

Run School of Imagination? Correct or add anything here, free.
Sources and dates

Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.

All checked November 2026.

State record

The state’s licensing transparency data reports 7 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 4 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=2, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=5, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=2. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.

From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.

Details

Large means the biggest quarter of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 76 to 312 children. Small is 8 to 30; medium is 31 to 75.

Watch