Skip to main content

Santa Rosa · Licensed center

Mt. Taylor Children's Center Three

At a glance

  • Small center, licensed for 30 children.
  • Run by a for-profit business, which holds the license.

What the state has found

The state cited no rules at any of its 6 licensing inspections since October 2022.

See each inspection

Licensing inspections

  • May 27, 2026Nothing cited
  • May 22, 2026Nothing cited
  • Feb 19, 2026Nothing cited
  • Nov 14, 2024Nothing cited
  • Nov 23, 2022Nothing cited
  • Oct 24, 2022Nothing cited

The state cited no rules at any of this center's 6 inspections. Most Bay Area centers inspected 6 times had at least one: 83% of 252.

How all 252 Bay Area centers inspected 6 times compare

Of the 252 Bay Area centers the state inspected 6 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:

  • None17%This center
  • 1 of 635%
  • 2 of 631%
  • 3 of 612%
  • 4 of 66%
Read every record and the state’s reports

State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing

Last visit
May 27, 2026
On file
6 visits since October 2022 — all of them cited nothing · 6 complaint investigations
Most serious
Type B — (a) The child care center shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times to ensure the safety and well-being of children, employees and visitors. (1) The licensee shall take measures to keep the center free of flies, other insects, and rodents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews from interviews from D1 and staff (S1 & S2), ants were observed in one child’s lunchbox and in the facility hallway wall; this poses a potential health, safety and/or personal rights risk to the children in care. · August 14, 2025

California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.

May 2026 Licensing visit nothing cited
May 2026 Licensing visit nothing cited
Feb 2026 Licensing visit nothing cited
May 2025 Complaint 2 of 4 allegations substantiated

Complaint · May 22, 2025

California decided each allegation separately.

Substantiated

  • Staff do not ensure the facility is free of pests or insects
  • Staff yell at children in care

Unsubstantiated

  • Staff do not allow children to have water throughout the day
  • Staff leave children in soiled diapers for an extended period

Substantiated: the state found it more likely than not that it happened. Unsubstantiated: the state could not tell whether it happened.

CCR 101238(a)(1) · Type B

(a) The child care center shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times to ensure the safety and well-being of children, employees and visitors. (1) The licensee shall take measures to keep the center free of flies, other insects, and rodents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews from interviews from D1 and staff (S1 & S2), ants were observed in one child’s lunchbox and in the facility hallway wall; this poses a potential health, safety and/or personal rights risk to the children in care.

CCR 101223(a)(1) · Type B

101223(a)(1) Personal Rights:(a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights...To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on interviews from D1 and S1, a staff member yelled inappropriate comments towards the daycare children; this poses a potential health, safety and/or personal rights risk to the children in care.

State report, August 14, 2025

Nov 2024 Licensing visit nothing cited
Apr 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · April 24, 2024

ALLEGATION(S): Staff do not provide children with adequate supervision Staff are operating over ratio Staff isolated daycare child INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: A subsequent complaint investigation visit was conducted today by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.P. who met with Director, F.M. for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings for the above allegation. LPA previously conducted an inspection on 04/24/2024 to initiate the investigation and met with Director to discuss the allegations, conduct interview(s), make observations, and request documents. It is alleged that staff do not provide children with adequate supervision specifically there were incidents involving a child biting and that staff was not able to control the environment. Also, its alleged that staff are operating over ratio specifically that the facility are understaffed. Finally, it was alleged that staff isolated a daycare child specifically that a child was left alone in a room. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with the Director (D1), 2 Staff (S1 – S2), 3 children (C2-C4) & 6 Adults (A2-A8) from 04/25/2024 to 07/22/2024. D1 denied the allegations. Staff acknowledged the biting incident and has submitted a report to the Department. According to staff the incident was not due to inadequate supervision. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Feb 2024 Complaint 1 of 4 allegations substantiated

Complaint · February 2, 2024

California decided each allegation separately.

Substantiated

  • Staff spoke inappropriately to daycare child

Unsubstantiated

  • Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for daycare children
  • Staff yelled at daycare child
  • Staff didn’t intervene while daycare children were pushing each other

Substantiated: the state found it more likely than not that it happened. Unsubstantiated: the state could not tell whether it happened.

CCR 101223(a)(1) · Type B

101223(a)(1) Personal Rights:(a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights...To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews it was confirmed that a staff member spoke inappropriately to daycare child This poses a potential health, safety and/or personal rights risk to the children in care.

State report, April 4, 2024

Nov 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated

Complaint · November 17, 2023

ALLEGATION(S): Staff did not inform authorized representative of incident timely INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: A subsequent complaint investigation visit was conducted today by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.P. who met with Licensee, V.D. & Director, K.G. for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings for the above allegations. LPA previously conducted an inspection on 11/20/2023 to initiate the investigation and met with Director, K.G. to discuss the allegations, conduct interview(s), make observations, and request documents. It is alleged that Staff did not inform authorized representative of incident timely, specifically that an authorized representative was not reported timely on an incident that happened in October. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with the Director, 3 staff members (S1, S4, S5) & 5 Parents (P1-P5) from 11/20/2023 to 12/05/2023. D1 stated the facility would send a text message or call children’s representatives of any incident as soon as possible. D1 claimed to have notified the authorized representative but cannot recall informing them of the incident involved (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

State report

Sep 2023 Complaint 1 of 3 allegations substantiated

Complaint · September 18, 2023

California decided each allegation separately.

Substantiated

  • Staff failed to report incident to parent in a timely manner.

Unsubstantiated

  • Staff yell at children in care.
  • Staff did not intervene with children having an altercation in a timely manner.

Substantiated: the state found it more likely than not that it happened. Unsubstantiated: the state could not tell whether it happened.

CCR 101173(b)(2) · Type B

101173 Plan of Operation (b) The plan and related materials shall contain the following: (2) Statement of admission policies and procedures. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on staff Interviews, the center failed to follow the center's policies and procedures and did not notify a parent of an incident in a timely matter. This poses a potential Health and Safety risk to children in care.

State report, December 7, 2023

Nov 2022 Licensing visit nothing cited
Oct 2022 Licensing visit nothing cited

Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.

Details

Phone
(707) 526-3008
Address
812 Vineyard Creek Drive, Santa Rosa, 95403
License
493010314

We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, and sick and biting policies. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.

Run Mt. Taylor Children's Center Three? Correct or add anything here, free.
Sources and dates

Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.

All checked November 2026.

State record

The state’s licensing transparency data reports 8 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 5 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=4, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=11, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=4. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.

From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.

Details

Small means the smallest quarter of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 8 to 30 children. Medium is 31 to 75; large is 76 to 312.

Watch