Redwood City · Licensed family home
Maria Andino Family Child Care
- Full-size family home, licensed for up to 14 children.
- Run by the person who holds the license.
- Shortlist has found no website for it yet.
What these mean, and where they come from
Full-size means licensed for 14 children, the most any Bay Area family home holds; 442 of Bay Area’s 466 licensed family homes are. Small is 10 to 13.
Source for who runs it
ccld.dss.ca.govShortlist doesn’t have these yet: cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, sick and biting policies.
What the state has found
Routine visits: 1 of 3 cited something
Bay Area family homes: the state cites something at about 1 in 4 routine visits. Three visits are too few to read as a pattern.
From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked September 25, 2026.
Read every record and the state’s reports
State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing
- Last visit
- January 13, 2025
- On file
- 3 visits since April 2022 — 2 cited nothing · 1 complaint investigation
- Most serious
- Type A —
(e) If no assistant provider is present at a Large Family Child Care Home, then the licensee shall comply with the capacity requirements for a Small Family Child Care Home as specified in subsections (b) and (c). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as upon arrival of LPA, assistant was supervising 8 children (4 infants and 4 preschoolers) without an additional assistant making the facility be over capacity which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
· October 22, 2024
California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.
Oct 2024 Licensing visit 2 findings
Licensing visit · October 22, 2024
CCR 102416.5(e) · Type A
(e) If no assistant provider is present at a Large Family Child Care Home, then the licensee shall comply with the capacity requirements for a Small Family Child Care Home as specified in subsections (b) and (c). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as upon arrival of LPA, assistant was supervising 8 children (4 infants and 4 preschoolers) without an additional assistant making the facility be over capacity which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
CCR 102425(j)(2)(D)(c) · Type B
Documentation shall be maintained in the infant’s file and be available to the Department for review. Documentation shall include the following: Time of each 15-minute check This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as she is not maintaining the safe sleep logs for children under 24 months which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Oct 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · October 17, 2024
Unsubstantiated
ALLEGATION(S): Daycare child sustained unexplained injuries while in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On January 13th, 2025 at approximately 9:30am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tapia-Mandujano conducted an unannounced, complaint investigation and met with licensee, Maria Isabel Andino to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to licensee. LPA toured the home for health and safety hazards. Present in the facility are licensee and assistant supervising 8 children (2 infants and 6 preschoolers). All adults working or living in the facility have fingerprint clearance and are associated. Complaint was received by the Department on 10/17/24. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with licensee, parents, assistant, and involved parties. LPA also gathered pertinent documents. The investigation determined there is not enough available information to prove that a daycare child sustained unexplained injuries while in care. Per interviews conducted, any accidents/injuries that happen are communicated with families with a picture of injuries or verbally at pick up. Although the allegations above may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with License, Maria Isabel Andino and copy of this report was provided. Report was translated into Spanish by LPA Tapia-Mandujano to licensee. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to maintain postings as required, will result in an immediate $100 civil penalty. This report is public and can be reviewed. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
How the comparison is built
Routine visits: across Bay Area family homes, the state cites something at about 1 in 4 routine visits (2,008 visits).
Details
- Area
- Redwood City, 94063
- License
- 414002496, active
Do you run Maria Andino Family Child Care? Shortlist has no tuition, hours or ratios for it, because the state does not publish that. Adding it is free and takes about ten minutes.
Add what is missingSources and dates
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
State record
Every state visit and complaint on file, shown in full and never edited. Open a date to read what the state wrote.
Details
- Phone, License — Checked July 2026 ccld.dss.ca.gov
- Who runs it — Checked September 2026 ccld.dss.ca.gov