Hayward · Licensed center
Level Up Montessori - Hayward
At a glance
- Large center, licensed for 78 children.
- Run by a for-profit business, which holds the license.
What the state has found
The state cited no rules at any of its 6 licensing inspections since January 2022.
See each inspection
Licensing inspections
- Jan 28, 2026Nothing cited
- Feb 21, 2025Nothing cited
- Jan 31, 2024Nothing cited
- Dec 9, 2022Nothing cited
- Dec 2, 2022Nothing cited
- Jan 31, 2022Nothing cited
The state cited no rules at any of this center's 6 inspections. Most Bay Area centers inspected 6 times had at least one: 83% of 252.
How all 252 Bay Area centers inspected 6 times compare
Of the 252 Bay Area centers the state inspected 6 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:
- None17%This center
- 1 of 635%
- 2 of 631%
- 3 of 612%
- 4 of 66%
Read every record and the state’s reports
State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing
- Last visit
- January 28, 2026
- On file
- 6 visits since January 2022 — all of them cited nothing · 4 complaint investigations
- Most serious
- No finding carrying a severity level in the last 24 months.
California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.
Sep 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · September 26, 2024
ALLEGATION(S): Physical Plant-Staff do not ensure a comfortable temperature for children in the facility is maintained at all times. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On October 2, 2024 at 8:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct an investigation into the above allegation. Upon arrival LPA was allowed in by the facility representative, B.R. Present during the visit were 44 preschool children and eight additional staff members. LPA informed the facility representative of the reason for visit. During the course of the investigation, observations and interviews were conducted. It was alleged that day care staff do not ensure a comfortable temperature for children in the facility is maintained at all times. Per director that temperature is always maintained at a comfortable level for children in care and never is set below the recommended 68 degrees. Per the reporting party the temperature was not comfortable for his child because when he picks up his child and touches there arm it's cold to the touch and he feels the facility had not done enough to make sure the children were warm. Based on interviews conducted and observations, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A notice of site visit was posted by the director. Exit interview conducted with B.R. and Notice of Site Visit provided. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 15
Oct 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · October 3, 2023
ALLEGATION(S): Personal Rights-Staff did not accord child dignity in their relationship with staff or other persons. Other-Staff left hazardous objects accessible to children Personal Rights-Staff spoke inappropriately to child while in care Personal Rights-Staff hit a child in care INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On December 11, 2023 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived to the facility unannounced to conclude an investigation into the above allegation. Upon arrival LPA was allowed in by the facility representative, B.R. Present during the visit were 25 pre-school children and three additional staff members. LPA informed the facility representative of the reason for visit and toured the facility. Based on the interviews and observations conducted, this agency has investigated the complaint that staff did not accord child dignity in their relationship with staff or other persons and the LPA determined that the complaint was UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning , Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with the facility representatives,B.R., appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for a period of 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 10 On December 11, 2023 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived to the facility unannounced to conclude an investigation into the above allegation. Upon arrival LPA was allowed in by the facility representative, B.R. Present during the visit were 25 pre-school children and three additional staff members. LPA informed the facility representative of the reason for visit and toured the facility. Based on the interviews and observations conducted, this agency has investigated the complaint that staff left hazardous objects accessible to children and the LPA determined that the complaint was UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with the facility representatives,B.R., appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for a period of 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 10 On December 11, 2023 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived to the facility unannounced to conclude an investigation into the above allegation. Upon arrival LPA was allowed in by the facility representative, B.R. Present during the visit were 25 pre-school children and three additional staff members. LPA informed the facility representative of the reason for visit and toured the facility. Based on the interviews and observations conducted, this agency has investigated the complaint that staff spoke inappropriately to child while in care and the LPA determined that the complaint was UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with the facility representatives,B.R., appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for a period of 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 10 On December 11, 2023 at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived to the facility unannounced to conclude an investigation into the above allegation. Upon arrival LPA was allowed in by the facility representative, B.R. Present during the visit were 25 pre-school children and three additional staff members. LPA informed the facility representative of the reason for visit and toured the facility. Based on the interviews and observations conducted, this agency has investigated the complaint that staff hit a child in care and the LPA determined that the complaint was UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with the facility representatives,B.R., appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for a period of 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 10
Jul 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · July 17, 2023
ALLEGATION(S): Qualifications-Teacher is not qualified, no ECE units INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On August 7, 2023 at 1:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived to the facility unannounced to conclude an investigation into the above allegation. Upon arrival LPA was allowed in by the facility representative, S.A. Present during the visit were 42 pre school age children and four additional staff members. LPA informed the facility representative of the reason for visit and toured the facility. Based on interviews conducted and observations, the allegation that a teacher is not qualified, no ECE units has been found to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with S.A., appeal rights and Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for a period of 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 5
Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.
Details
- Phone
- (408) 431-7003
- Address
- 31145 Mission Boulevard, Hayward, 94544
- License
- 015700555
We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, and sick and biting policies. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.
Sources and dates
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
All checked November 2026.
State record
The state’s licensing transparency data reports 9 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 3 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=6, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.
From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.
Details
- Phone, Address, License, Who runs it ccld.dss.ca.gov
Large means the biggest quarter of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 76 to 312 children. Small is 8 to 30; medium is 31 to 75.