Learn and Play Montessori Dublin

CCR 101229(a)(1) · Type B

101229 Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision (a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. (1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time, except as specified in Sections 101216.2(e)(1) and 101230(c)(1). Supervision shall include visual observation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the interviews, and record reviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential risk to the health, safety, and personal rights of the children in care.

ALLEGATION(S): -Facility failed to report an incident to parent. -Facility failed to provide adequate supervision to children in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with director G.A. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present for today's visit, there were director , and 20 staff members supervising 132 children. Based on the interviews, the facility indicated that a concern had been brought to the school’s attention; however, there are no supporting documents to verify the alleged incident. The facility is equipped with CCTV cameras; however, due to the system’s retention policy, the footage could not be retrieved. The facility’s agreement states that the system’s hard drive retains footage for up to seven calendar days. Therefore, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Notice of site visit was provided and must be posted for 30 days. Appeal rights were given, and an exit interview was conducted with director G.A. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with director G.A. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present for today's visit, there were director , and 20 staff members supervising 132 children. Based on the information obtained during the course of investigation, no one reported witnessing any concerning incident. LPA did not receive any supporting documentation to support the allegation. Therefore, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Notice of site visit was provided and must be posted for 30 days. Appeal rights were given, and an exit interview was conducted with director G.A. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): -Child was left in a soiled diaper for an extended period of time -Staff utilized inappropriate form of discipline when staff withheld child's shoe. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with director G.A. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present for today's visit, there were director , and 20 staff members supervising 132 children. Based on the interviews conducted during the course of the investigation, interviews revealed that the child was changed every time it was needed. The facility has a safe and healthy diaper-changing policy in place, which is signed and acknowledged by staff. LPA did not obtain any concrete evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Notice of site visit was provided and must be posted for thirty days. Appeal rights were given, and an exit interview was conducted with director G.A. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J.S. arrived unannounced to deliver the findings from a complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with director G.A. and explained the purpose of the inspection. Present for today's visit, there were director , and 20 staff members supervising 132 children. Based on the interviews, the facility acknowledged that an incident occurred in which a child threw his shoes to the other side of the school during outdoor play time. The facility was in the process of determining how to retrieve the shoes. The facility denied that this was ever used as a form of disciplining the child. Therefore, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Notice of site visit was provided and must be posted for thirty days. Appeal rights were given, and an exit interview was conducted with director G.A. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

CCR 101229(a)(1) · Type B

101229(a)(1)Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision:(a)The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. (1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time, except as specified in Sections 101216.2(e)(1) and 101230(c)(1). Supervision shall include visual observation This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on the interviews and record reviews, the facility did not comply with the section cited above. (C1) was left unattended in the bathroom for approximately 3:00 minutes, which poses an potential health and safety risk to children in care.