San Francisco · Licensed center
L'academy Preschool Sf Nob Hill
At a glance
- Small center, licensed for 26 children.
- Run by a for-profit business, which holds the license.
What the state has found
The state cited no rules at any of its 4 licensing inspections since November 2021.
See each inspection
Licensing inspections
- Apr 8, 2026Nothing cited
- Oct 2, 2024Nothing cited
- Jan 27, 2023Nothing cited
- Nov 16, 2021Nothing cited
The state cited no rules at any of this center's 4 inspections. Most Bay Area centers inspected 4 times had at least one: 59% of 569.
How all 569 Bay Area centers inspected 4 times compare
Of the 569 Bay Area centers the state inspected 4 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:
- None41%This center
- 1 of 438%
- 2 of 415%
- 3 of 46%
- All 41%
Read every record and the state’s reports
State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing
- Last visit
- April 8, 2026
- On file
- 4 visits since November 2021 — all of them cited nothing · 5 complaint investigations
- Most serious
- No finding carrying a severity level in the last 24 months.
California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.
Oct 2025 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · October 1, 2025
ALLEGATION(S): Staff restrained children in care with a rope Staff handled child in care in a rough manner Staff yelled at child in care Staff tried to force daycare child to drink water INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On November 6, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director S.G. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present were Director, 3 teachers with 18 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that staff restrained, handled rough, yelled, or forced children in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Mar 2025 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · March 27, 2025
ALLEGATION(S): -Staff hit day care child -Staff handled day care child in a rough manner INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On May 19, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director S.G. to discuss the above allegations. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 3 staff with 17 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the staff hit or handled children in rough manner. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
May 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · May 17, 2023
ALLEGATION(S): -Day care children engaged in an inappropriate interaction due to lack of supervision. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On July 19, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director S.G. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 3 staff with 10 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility day care children engaged in an inappropriate interaction due to lack of supervision. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
May 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · May 12, 2023
ALLEGATION(S): - Staff yell at children - Staff handled child in a rough manner - Staff are unable to meet the needs of the children in care due to a language barrier INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On July 19, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director S.G. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 3 staff with 10 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the staff yell at children, handled child in rough manner, or unable to meet needs of children. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.
Details
- Phone
- (415) 706-2559
- Address
- 1868 Van Ness Avenue Unit 1, San Francisco, 94109
- License
- 384004192
We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, and sick and biting policies. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.
Sources and dates
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
All checked November 2026.
State record
The state’s licensing transparency data reports 4 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 4 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=10, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.
From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.
Details
- Phone, Address, License, Who runs it ccld.dss.ca.gov
Small means the smallest quarter of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 8 to 30 children. Medium is 31 to 75; large is 76 to 312.