Kids Konnect Pacifica

ALLEGATION(S): Staff did not ensure that a child's needs were met INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On August 13, 2026, at 2.56PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tso conducted an unannounced visit for delivery of the complaint investigation findings and met with the Director, A.L. and the Owner, J.J. (who was not the facility and arrived at the facility at approximately 3.29 pm). LPA was granted entry to the facility by the Director. LPA explained the purpose of the inspection. Present, the Director, the Owner and 5 teachers are supervising 25 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff members and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews, observation and records review, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the allegation listed above, occurred. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and this report was reviewed with the Owner whose signature confirm has read the report. Report must be made available for public review upon request. A copy of this report and appeal rights have been discussed and left with the Owner. Notice of Site Visit shall remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): Licensee has unqualified staff providing supervision to children Licensee allows uncleared staff to provide care to children Licensee does not ensure a safe environment is provided to children in care INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On August 13, 2026, at 2.56PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tso conducted an unannounced visit for delivery of the complaint investigation findings and met with the Director, A.L. and the Owner, J.J. (who was not the facility and arrived at the facility at approximately 3.29 pm). LPA was granted entry to the facility by the Director. LPA explained the purpose of the inspection. Present, the Director, the Owner and 5 teachers are supervising 25 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff members and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews, records review and observation, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the allegations listed above, occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and this report was reviewed with the Owner whose signature confirm has read the report. Report must be made available for public review upon request. A copy of this report and appeal rights have been discussed and left with the Onwer. Notice of Site Visit shall remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): Staff did not follow food allergy list. Staff did not communicate with day care children's responsible parties of communicable disease. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On July 24, 2026, at 8.35AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tso conducted an unannounced visit for delivery of the complaint investigation findings and met with the Director, A.L. / Owner, J.J. (not at the facility and arrived at approximately 9.22AM). LPA explained the purpose of the inspection and were granted entry to the facility by the Director. Present, the Owner, Director and 5 teachers are supervising 32 children. The facility operates within capacity limits and ratio during LPAs’ visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff members and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews, observation and documents review, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the allegations listed above, occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and this report was reviewed with the Owner whose signature confirm have read the report. Report must be made available for public review upon request. A copy of this report and appeal rights have been discussed and left with Owner. Notice of Site Visit shall remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): Staff are operating out of ratio. Licensee did not ensure the center had a qualified director. Staff did not ensure children were supervised at all times. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On July 24, 2026, at 8.35AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tso conducted an unannounced visit for delivery of the complaint investigation findings and met with the Director, A.L. / Owner, J.J. (not at the facility and arrived at approximately 9.22AM). LPA explained the purpose of the inspection and were granted entry to the facility by the Director. Present, the Owner, Director and 5 teachers are supervising 32 children. The facility operates within capacity limits and ratio during LPAs’ visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff members and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews, observation and documents review, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that the allegations listed above, occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and this report was reviewed with the Owner whose signature confirm have read the report. Report must be made available for public review upon request. A copy of this report and appeal rights have been discussed and left with Owner. Notice of Site Visit shall remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: