Facessf - Bayview Preschool

ALLEGATION(S): -Facility staff are not taking measures to keep the center free of rodents INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On September 29, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director M.S. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 11 teachers with 39 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that facility are not taking measures to keep the center free of rodents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director M.S. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

CCR 101229(a)(1) · Type B

101229 Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision (a) The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary...(1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time, except as specified... Supervision shall include visual observation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, facility did not ensure to provide supervision at all times, which poses a potential Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

ALLEGATION(S): -Staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in day care child harming another day care child. -Staff did not notify parent after child sustained injury while in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On September 29, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director M.S. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 11 teachers with 39 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that staff did not provide supervision or notify parent after injury. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director M.S. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): Staff did not inform day care children parents of incident in a timely manner INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On February 23, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a complaint inspection and met with Director L.B. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 16 staff with 40 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility did not inform parents of incident in a timely manner. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit Interview was conducted with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): Staff did not ensure facility plumbing was not in disrepair Staff did not ensure waste was disposed of in a timely manner INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On February 23, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director L.B. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 16 staff with 40 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility staff did not ensure plumbing in disrepair or dispose waste. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit Interview was conducted with director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): -Staff do not maintain facility in good repair -Staff do not maintain facility sanitary INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On January 12, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director L.B. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present was Director, 9 teachers with 30 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility staff did not maintain facility in good repair and sanitary. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

CCR 101223(a)(1) · Type B

101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on investigation, Facility did not ensure Personal Rights for child which poses a potential Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

ALLEGATION(S): Staff member inappropriately handled a child INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On April 3, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director P.M. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 18 staff with 48 children in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the facility staff member inappropriately handled a child. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director P.M. Report was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

CCR 101226(a)(2) · Type B

101226 Health-Related Services (a) The licensee shall immediately notify the child's authorized representative... The licensee shall obtain specific instructions from the authorized representative (2) In the case of less serious injuries including, but not limited to, minor cut... the licensee shall document the injury in the child's record and notify the child's authorized representative of the nature of the injury when the child is picked up from the center. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, facility did not ensure to notify the child's authorized representative of incident, which poses a potential Health, Safety, and Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

ALLEGATION(S): -Staff retaliated against child's authorized representative -Staff did not speak in an appropriate manner while in front of children INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On December 19, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director R.K. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 13 staff with 48 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that staff retaliated against authorized represntative or speak in unappropriate manner. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director R.K. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): -Staff did not allow a child’s authorized representative to observe in a classroom. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On December 19, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director R.K. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 13 staff with 48 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that staff did not allow child's authorized representative to observe classroom. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director R.K. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

ALLEGATION(S): -Staff handled day care child in a rough manner -Staff yelling at day care child INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On December 19, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director R.K. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 13 staff with 48 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, parents, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove that staff handled child rough or yelled at child. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director R.K. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit shall be posted for 30 consecutive days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:

101700.3(b)(1) · Type B

101700.3 California Lead Action Level at Child Care Centers (b)(1) A result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on results received from the certified water samplers, the facility exceeded 5.5 ppb of lead in their water source. Once received, the facility began taking actions to remediate the fixtures. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

ALLEGATION(S): Staff do not isolate ill daycare children. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On March 30, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), S.L. conducted a subsequent complaint inspection and met with Director R.K. to discuss the above allegation. Purpose of the inspection was explained. Present is Director, 10 staff with 48 children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted with Director, staff, and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was unsufficient evidence to prove the staff do not isolate ill children. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. LPA conducted exit interview with Director. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: