Oakland · Licensed center
De Colores Child Development Center
At a glance
- Large center, licensed for 134 children.
What the state has found
The state cited rules at 2 of its 5 licensing inspections since June 2022.
See each inspection
Licensing inspections
- May 14, 2026Nothing cited
- Feb 10, 2026Nothing cited
Apr 28, 20231 citation
101700.3(b)(1)Type B
“Lead Testing Written D.A. result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on record review four faucets at the facility (identified as faucets W-1, W-2, W-3, and W-4) used by children had a lead exceedance, which poses a potential risk to the health and safety of children in care.”
101700.3(b)(1)
Oct 3, 20221 citation
CCR 101229(a)(1)Type A
“101229 Responsibility for Providing Care & Supervision (a) [..] provide care and supervision [..]meet the children's needs (1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision [..] include visual observation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interviews Child 1 and Child 2 were left unattended leaving the classroom and walking to the playground on the second level, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.”
CCR 101229(a)(1)
- Jun 29, 2022Nothing cited
The state cited rules at 2 of this center's 5 inspections. Most Bay Area centers inspected 5 times had fewer: 64% of 457 had rules cited at 1 or none.
How all 457 Bay Area centers inspected 5 times compare
Of the 457 Bay Area centers the state inspected 5 times, how many of those inspections cited a rule:
- None29%
- 1 of 535%
- 2 of 523%This center
- 3 of 59%
- 4 of 54%
- All 5under 1%
Read every record and the state’s reports
State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing
- Last visit
- May 14, 2026
- On file
- 5 visits since June 2022 — 3 cited nothing · 3 complaint investigations
- Most serious
- Type A —
101229 Responsibility for Providing Care & Supervision (a) [..] provide care and supervision [..]meet the children's needs (1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision [..] include visual observation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interviews Child 1 and Child 2 were left unattended leaving the classroom and walking to the playground on the second level, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
· October 3, 2022
California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.
Apr 2024 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · April 8, 2024
ALLEGATION(S): Parent discovered a bruise on the child's left arm and parent believes it happened in the day care. Staff uses a harsh direct tone that intimidates day care children. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: LPA's M.C. and D.C. met with center Director R.T. for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. Present for the investigation were 7 staff members and 7 children in care. It was alleged that a child sustained a minor unexplained injury while in care. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted. Per reporting party, an incident occurred when she discovered a bruise on child's left arm after picking her up from day care. Per staff interviews, children obtain small bruises or scratches due to normal child play. None of the interviewed staff reported observing any injury while the child was in care nor did she display signs of having sustained an injury while in care. Interviews disclosed that although children have sustained occasional minor scratches or bruises, these minor injuries have occurred as a result of normal routines of children play. Based on the investigative findings, there was no evidence that proved whether or not the injury occurred while in care. In addition, there was no evidence to prove or disprove that, if the injury did occur, it was due to lack of supervision. Therefore, the allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated at this time. A Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: LPA's M.C. and D.C. met with center Director R.T. for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. Present for the investigation were 7 staff and 7 children in care. It was alleged that Staff uses a harsh direct tone that intimidates day care children. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted and files reviewed. Per reporting party, a child became visibly nervous while being given directions from teacher. Interviews disclosed that although teacher does have a loud voice and is very direct when talking to children, it is not in a mean or threatful way. None of the staff interviewed reported observing any concerns regarding any of the teachers. Interviews also disclosed that children in this class are very attached and display a close relationship with both teachers in the classroom. Based on the investigative findings, there was no evidence to prove whether or not the allegation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated at this time. A Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Aug 2023 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · August 22, 2023
ALLEGATION(S): Day care child sustained an unexplained injury while in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: LPA D.C. met with center Director A.B. for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that a child sustained an injury that resembled a hand print on his face without staff's knowledge and/or observation. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted. After picking up her child at the end of the day, a parent informed Director that a hand print was observed on a child who could not verbalize what occurred. Per staff, the child did not suffer any injury nor display any marks or signs of discomfort or infliction of pain during the day. Interviews revealed that child was observed sleeping face down on his hands for the duration of his nap. Per staff child did not display any visible marks upon pickup. Neither staff, nor the parent were able to determine how, when and/or where the alleged injury may have occurred. Based on the investigative findings LPA was unable to determine if the alleged hand print on child's face happened as a result of a personal rights violation or due to child sleeping on his own hands during nap time. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged personal rights violation(s) did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and report reviewed with Center Director A.B. Notice of Site Visit provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Apr 2023 Licensing visit 1 finding
Licensing visit · April 28, 2023
101700.3(b)(1) · Type B
Lead Testing Written D.A. result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on record review four faucets at the facility (identified as faucets W-1, W-2, W-3, and W-4) used by children had a lead exceedance, which poses a potential risk to the health and safety of children in care.
Oct 2022 Licensing visit 1 finding
Licensing visit · October 3, 2022
CCR 101229(a)(1) · Type A
101229 Responsibility for Providing Care & Supervision (a) [..] provide care and supervision [..]meet the children's needs (1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision [..] include visual observation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interviews Child 1 and Child 2 were left unattended leaving the classroom and walking to the playground on the second level, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Shortlist replaces people’s names in the state’s text with initials. This is done by rule, not by hand, so it can miss a name or shorten a word that isn’t one. The state’s report, linked on each row, has the original.
Details
- Phone
- (510) 535-6106
- Address
- 1155 - 35th Avenue, Oakland, 94601
- License
- 013417305
We couldn’t find some information that may matter to your decision: openings, child care subsidies, cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, sick and biting policies, and who owns it. We can ask the program for you and copy you in.
Sources and dates
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
All checked November 2026.
State record
The state’s licensing transparency data reports 3 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 2 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=3, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.
From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked November 5, 2026.
Details
- Phone, Address, License ccld.dss.ca.gov
Large means the biggest quarter of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 76 to 312 children. Small is 8 to 30; medium is 31 to 75.