San Mateo · Licensed center
Bright Horizons at San Mateo
- Medium center, licensed for 72 children.
- Shortlist has found no website for it yet.
What these mean, and where they come from
Medium means the middle half of Bay Area’s 439 licensed centers by state-licensed capacity: 31 to 75 children. Small is 8 to 30; large is 76 to 312.
Shortlist doesn’t have these yet: cost, hours and late pickup, teaching approach, ratios and staff, a typical day, sick and biting policies.
What the state has found
Routine visits: 1 of 5 cited something
Bay Area centers: the state cites something at about 1 in 4 routine visits.
From California CDSS Community Care Licensing’s published reports, last checked September 25, 2026.
Read every record and the state’s reports
State record — California CDSS Community Care Licensing
- Last visit
- August 20, 2026
- On file
- 5 visits since January 2023 — 4 cited nothing · 4 complaint investigations
- Most serious
- Type B —
(b) The person who brings the child to, and removes the child from, the center shall sign the child in/out. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 5 out of 57 children present today, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
· June 9, 2026
California CDSS publishes the full investigation narrative for a complaint, including its disposition, and classifies a citation Type A — an immediate risk to a child — or Type B.
Jun 2026 Complaint
Complaint · June 26, 2026
ALLEGATION(S): -Staff are not ensuring adequate staffing to operate within ratio -Staff are not ensuring adequate staffing to meet the toileting needs of children in care. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On August 20, 2026, at approximately 12:15PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tse and Alvarado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPAs met with Director L.M. and explained the purpose of the visit. Present during the visit were 8 staff and 54 preschool age children. During the course of the investigation, site observations, interviews, and record reviews were conducted. During site visits, LPAs observed the facility to be operating within ratio requirements. Based on record review, qualifications of teachers employed at the facility were verified. Sign-in sheets and teacher schedules were reviewed. There is no direct evidence to support or deny the above allegations. Based on relevant information reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. A notice of site visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with Director, L.M. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Individual employees are shown by initials. The state’s report, linked above, names them in full.
Jun 2026 Licensing visit 1 finding
Licensing visit · June 9, 2026
CCR 101229.1(b) · Type B
(b) The person who brings the child to, and removes the child from, the center shall sign the child in/out. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 5 out of 57 children present today, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
May 2026 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · May 5, 2026
Unsubstantiated
ALLEGATION(S): Staff left daycare child in soiled diaper for a period of time. INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On June 9, 2026, at approximately 9:10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jonathan Tse conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA met with Director L.M. and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted site observations, record review, and interviews with relevant parties. LPA did not observe children to be left in soiled diapers. LPA observed staff taking children to the bathroom for toileting needs. Based on interviews, classes have a routine where they are taken to the bathroom on a regular basis. There is no direct evidence to support or deny the above allegation. Based on relevant information reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. A notice of site visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted and report was reviewed with Director, L.M. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Individual employees are shown by initials. The state’s report, linked above, names them in full.
Apr 2026 Complaint Unsubstantiated
Complaint · April 25, 2026
Unsubstantiated
ALLEGATION(S): -Facility is operating out of ratio INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On June 9, 2026, at approximately 9:10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jonathan Tse conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA met with Director L.M. and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted site observations, record review, and interviews with relevant parties. LPA did not observe the facility to be operating out of ratio. Based on record review, LPA observed that teachers stationed in each classroom have units and are qualified as teachers. Interviews indicated that there are methods of communication (walkie talkies/telephones) that can be used by teachers to request assistance to meet ratios. There is no direct evidence to support or deny the above allegation. ***Continued on Page Two*** Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion:
Individual employees are shown by initials. The state’s report, linked above, names them in full.
How the comparison is built
Routine visits: across Bay Area centers, the state cites something at about 1 in 4 routine visits (2,260 visits).
Details
- Address
- 1700 Alameda De Las Pulgas
- License
- 414004968, active
- Ownership
- For-profitSource: ccld.dss.ca.gov
The state licenses this address more than once, to the same licensee.
The infant-center license is published separately, with its own license and its own inspection record:
Bright Horizons at San MateoDo you run Bright Horizons at San Mateo? Shortlist has no tuition, hours or ratios for it, because the state does not publish that. Adding it is free and takes about ten minutes.
Add what is missingSources and dates
Where every fact on this page came from, and when Shortlist last checked it against that source. Anything Shortlist could not source is named here rather than left blank.
State record
Every state visit and complaint on file, shown in full and never edited. Open a date to read what the state wrote.
The state’s licensing transparency data reports 6 complaint-related visit(s) to this facility, while 3 complaint investigation report(s) are published on the transparency portal. State complaint counts: substantiated=0, inconclusive=0, unsubstantiated=4, unfounded=CONFIDENTIAL, Type A citations=0, Type B citations=0. The state publishes no further detail for the difference.
Details
- Phone, Address, License — Checked July 2026 ccld.dss.ca.gov
- Ownership — Checked September 2026 ccld.dss.ca.gov