Bing Nursery School

CCR 101229(a)(1) · Type A

CCR 101229(a)(1) No child(ren) shall be left without the supervision of a teacher at any time, except as specified in Sections 101216.2(e)(1) and 101230(c)(1). Supervision shall include visual observation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one child had allegedly sustained an injury that required medical attention due to lack of adequate supervision, which poses an immediate health, safety, and/or personal rights risk to persons in care.

ALLEGATION(S): Record Keeping-Staff did not maintain complete records for the child in the childcare center. Other-Staff did not keep the child's authorized person informed about the child's care INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: On January 21, 2026, at 11:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived at the facility unannounced to conclude an investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA informed the facility director J.W. of the purpose of the visit and conducted a tour of the facility. There were 114 children present today and 23 staff members. LPA W. conducted interviews with parents, director, and staff. Base on interviews conducted the center did not provided the parent with the address, telephone, and name of the childs mental health provider. The allegation that staff did not maintain complete records for the child in the childcare center has been SUBSTANTIATED. Based on LPA's interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. LPA W. issued a technical violation to the center. A technical violation in childcare refers to a minor, administrative, or paperwork-related infraction of licensing regulations that does not pose an immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of children. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were given and discussed. An exit interview was conducted with the director J.W. Substantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 5 On January 21, 2026, at 11:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) E.W. arrived at the facility unannounced to conclude an investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA informed the facility director J.W. of the purpose of the visit and conducted a tour of the facility. There were 114 children present today and 23 staff members. LPA W. conducted interviews with parents, director, and staff. Base on interviews conducted the Reporting Party was using regulation he look up from the Department of Education and did not pertain to preschools. The allegation that staff did not keep the child's authorized person informed about the child's care is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Based on LPA's interviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were given and discussed. An exit interview was conducted with the director J.W. Unsubstantiated Estimated Days of Completion: 5

101700.3(b)(1) · Type B

101700.3(b)(1) Lead Testing Written D.A. result with values of 5.5 ppb or greater shall be deemed an Action Level Exceedance. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, facility has 1 outlet of water test 5.5 ppb or greater, which is a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.